1/1/2024 0 Comments Explicit memoryThese data indicate two additional dimensions along which implicit and explicit memory differ and, furthermore, they support recent conceptualizations of processing differences underlying these two forms of memory.Īnderson, C. However, although significant priming was obtained, the extent of this priming was uninfluenced by lag. Recognition was affected by lag, with lag 6 items being recognized better than lag 0 items. Memory for the itemswas assessed by recognition and by priming in fragment completion. Halfthe items were repeatedimmediately (lag 0) and halfwere repeated after six intervening items (lag 6). Subjects studied a list of target items that were each repeated twice. In Experiment 2, we examined whether priming in fragment completion is influenced by the nature of repetition during initial learning. In contrast, fragment completion was completely unaffected by this additional processing, even though substantial priming was observed. Recognition performance was significantly impaired by the imposition of secondary processing demands during the original learning phase. Twenty-four hours later, the subjects’ memory for target items in the sentence-verification task was tested explicitly by means of a recognition task and implicitly by examining the extent to which the items primed fragment completion. While carrying out this task, half of the subjects were also required to carry out a secondary processing task involving tone monitoring. In Experiment 1, subjects first undertook a sentenceverification task. In this article, we report two experiments that provide further evidence concerning the differential nature of implicit and explicit memory.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |